Important notice: Website update - 21st of November 2024
Coming soon - Please be aware that we're currently working on a new and improved website. We're working hard to resolve the final issues and bring you the new website as soon as possible.
IP 389: Determination of wax appearance temperature (WAT) of middle distillate fuels by differential thermal analysis (DTA) or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
- Method adopted/last revised: 1993
- Method reapproved: 2004
- REF/ISBN: IP389-2934869
- Status: Current
- First printed in STM books: January 2004
-
Scope
This standard describes methods for the determination of the temperature at which waxy solids form when middle distillate fuels are cooled. The wax appearance temperature (WAT) of a fuel is related to the lowest temperature of its utility for certain applications. Two procedures are presented in this method, designated method A (rapid procedure) and method B (slow procedure). The rapid procedure is convenient; the slow procedure yields results closer to the equilibrium value, with improved discrimination, and is expected to be applicable to fuels containing additives such as cloud point depressants, cold flow improvers and detergents. Both methods require only a very small sample (less than 50 ul).
NOTE 1 - For the relation to the wax appearance point (WAP) and cloud point (CP); see A.1 and A.2. Results from one laboratory on 25 base fuels indicate a direct correlation between WAT and either WAP (see A. I), or CP (see A.2) with correlation coefficients greater than 0.95.
Results in the literature (see A.3) where a similar DSC method was used on 95 middle distillates, indicate a correlation between the onset of crystallization by DSC and CP by IP 219 BS 2000: Part 219/ASTM D-2500 with correlation coefficients greater than 0.997. The slow procedure, method B, is based on work in the literature (see A.4) demonstrating improved precision with low cooling rates.
NOTE 2 - Limited work indicates that the slow procedure, method B, can be applied to crude oils with the modification of an increased sample size (at least 50 u1, or more, if the pan size allows), but precision has not been determined.
NOTE 3 - If a laboratory is set up for maximum sample throughput, one determination by method A takes about 10 min, and one determination by method B takes about 20 min.
For method A, precision has been determined within the range -26 °C to + 16 °C; for method B, precision has been determined within the range - 50 °C to + 15 °C. The precision samples were diesel, kerosine, light and heavy gas oil fuels.
Members Benefits
Are you an EI Member? If yes, register/log in now to ensure you receive free access or discounts to EI publications.
If you are not a Member, why not join today and receive all of the benefits of EI Membership? EI Members are entitled to a 25% discount on most EI publications.